Here's a brief description of what the headings mean in the tables above.
| Review Date | date the web site was reviewed (by me!)
|
|---|
| Stars | number of stars awarded to a site based on my point system
|
|---|
| Points | number of points awarded to the site (based on features available at the site)
|
|---|
| Files | number of files listed
|
|---|
| Categories | number of categories into which the files are separated
|
|---|
| Popular List | list of most frequent download
|
|---|
| Search | search site
|
|---|
| Latest Changes | most recent additions
|
|---|
| Newletter | email to registered visitors with site information
|
|---|
| Forum | Online discussions
|
|---|
| Local Download | download comes from the site servers
|
|---|
| Sort | user-selectable, multiple sort options
|
|---|
| Home Link | link to home page of the software
|
|---|
| Screen Shot | image of the application
|
|---|
| SW Rating | Rating of software by site editor, or by site visitors
|
|---|
| File Size | size of download
|
|---|
| Ver | version of software available for download
|
|---|
| Release Date | date of software release (not date added to the web site)
|
|---|
| Number Downloads | number of times file has been downloaded
|
|---|
| User Reviews | text comments by software users
|
|---|
| Fee | price charged to access site features
|
|---|
| Adv | advertising banners
|
|---|
| Popups | popup windows
|
|---|
| Special | unusual/unique site features
|
|---|
Return to top of document
Site Rating System
To rate the sites I created a point system. Features which I consider
must-haves get one point. All other features get 0.5 points. Negative features
get minums one point. Here's the list of features and the associated points:
| +1 point | +0.5 points | -1 point
|
|---|
| 1000 files | News Letters | Usage Fee
|
| 500 files | Forums | Adversitements
|
| 25 categories | #Downloads | PopUps
|
| Home Link | Local Files |  
|
| Screen Shot | Sort |  
|
| Popular List | User Comments |  
|
| Search |   |  
|
| SW Ratings |   |  
|
| Latest Changes |   |  
|
| File Size |   |  
|
| Version |   |  
|
| Release Date |   |  
|
With a maximum possible score of 15 points (all good features and none of the bad), stars are
awarded according to points as follows,
Earned Points | Stars
|
|---|
| 1-3 points | 1
|
| 4-6 points | 2
|
| 7-9 points | 3
|
| >9 points | 4
|
About a third of the sites do not use advertising. Those sites that
do use advertising tend to have more files and offer more features.
So, if you have a preference for sites with no advertising, you might
reconsider the potential benifits of sites with advertising. I found
the advertising to be a minimal distraction on most sites.
If you visit sites that use popup windows (which I really do hate!) you may want to
use one of the products such as Popup-Stopper.
Return to top of document
The Perfect Site
In addition to the features listed in the site table above, the following features
should also be a part of the perfect site. My ranking of sites will eventually
incorporate all of these.
| Desired Features | Description
|
|---|
| #Downloads
| the number of user downloads for each application is given (recent week, month, and year)
|
| Detailed Reviews
| more than a sentence or two of description, including comparisons with other, similar applications
|
| Comparative Reviews
| identification of competing applications and what distringuishes one over the other
|
| Instant Submittal
| files submitted by authors should be immediately available, possibly in a 'pending' file until the webmaster decides whether to keep it
|
| Links Status
| notification to users as to the % of links that are active, monitored at least weekly
|
| CD
| ability to create a shopping list of files which the webmaster will charge a nominal fee to create and mail a CD with the files on it
|
| Same Author
| list of all files at the site by the same author
|
| Email Option
| ability to email the URL to someone
|
| Broken Link
| simple way to report a broken link - available directly from the description page for each link without going through the user's email system
|
| System Requirements   
| identify which Operating Systems the application can be used under
|
| Pro Version
| if an improved version, with more features, is available from the author
|
This next list covers those features which I would consider to be a negative for
a site. As I mentioned earlier, there may be valid reasons why the webmaster wants
or must use these features, but from the site visitor's viewpoint, these features
are not desirable. I have seen all of these features used at many sites.
My ranking of sites takes already takes some of these into account. I'll eventually
use them all.
| Negative Features | Description
|
|---|
| Intermingled Freeware/Shareware
| Having both is fine, but a site should have a way to browse them separately
|
| Advertising
| It gets in the way of the navigational ease of the site and distracts the visitor
|
| PopUp Windows
| This is even more distracting that simple advertising. I leave sites that have popups.
|
| Adware / Spyware
| a freeware site should not include these. if this rule is broken, such files must at least be clearly marked
|
| Expiration
| freeware applications listed cannot expire (by date, number of trials, ...)
|
| Usage Fee
| While the need to fund the webmaster is legitimate, the visitor's goal is to have no site access fees
|
| Plug-in's
| no new browser plug-in's should be necessary to visit the site
|
| Non-Software Free Stuff   
| Lots of people want sites with free stuff, but please keep it away from freeeware
|
| Images
| Icons, cursors, wallpaper, screensavers, and other images are not applications.
|
| Short Pages
| splitting a list of files into multiple pages is a pain to navigate
|
Return to top of document
Other Sites
There are also some smaller, specialty freeware sites which I'd recommend.
These tend to be small sites with limited features but because of their
content I want to specificially recommend them.
- 256b.htm Compo
- <web4096>
- the5k.org
There are also some huge shareware sites that you should consider. These
sites also have freeware but do not emphasize the freeware.
- CNET
- SimTel.net
- TUCows
Return to top of document
Rejected Sites
These sites were reviewed, but were not included in my list of freeware sites
for the following reasons:
- Coma's Freeware List - inactive, no updates since 2002
- Freeware Publishing Site - inactive, no updates since 2001
- NeverExpires - has adware/demos mixed with freeware, cannot separate
- SofoTex - shareware and freeware mixed together, cannot separate