QBasic vs GW-BASIC
One good thing about GW-BASIC is that it is very, very simple and is
an excellent tool for teaching programming to a complete beginner.
It's very, very simple. The problem is that it lacks virtually all
features of a modern language, making it a poor choice for any long
term programming needs.
QBasic, while also very simple, does not provide many of the features
you'll find in modern languages. For that reason, I highly recommend QBasic over GW-BASIC.
This page documents the differences between the two languages,
clarifying the advantages of using QBasic.
You may also want to read these articles from the Microsoft Knowledge
Base on
feature
and behavior,
differences between QBasic and GW-BASIC.
Specific Feature Comparison
Here's a side by side listing of the functions/statements offered by
GW-BASIC and QBasic.
Within each major category, similar features are grouped together.
Categories are placed in no particular order.
Items in yellow have the same feature name, but differ somewhat in
operation. Items in red are not supported in the language.
|